Artificial intelligence is the broad field, machine learning is part of it, and deep learning is a branch of machine learning based on neural networks with multiple layers. They are not three competing products or three commercial tiers that a company should choose between based on price.

The practical difference lies in how a solution is built: how much behaviour is expressed through rules, what is adjusted using data, which representations the model learns and how its output is evaluated. An application can combine these components without presenting them to users as separate features.

Our guide to types of artificial intelligence separates the general classifications. Here we examine the AI–ML–DL relationship in greater depth and follow the same business problem through several approaches. The aim is to help you understand a technical proposal and request suitable evidence before implementation.

Colourful source code on a computer screen
Markus Spiske

AI, machine learning and deep learning: the relationship in brief

AI is a field encompassing methods for learning, search, planning, knowledge representation and problem-solving. Machine learning, or ML, uses algorithms that adjust models using data or experience. Deep learning, or DL, uses neural networks with multiple layers to learn representations and relationships within data.

The correct relationship: three nested levels

  1. AI · Artificial intelligence

    The broad field: learning, search, planning and reasoning.

    1. ML · Machine learning

      Part of AI: models adjusted using data or experience.

      1. DL · Deep learning

        Part of ML: neural networks with multiple layers.

Every deep-learning solution uses machine learning, but not every AI system uses deep learning.

This is a relationship of inclusion. A deep-learning system is also a machine-learning system. However, a decision tree trained on data is ML, but does not become deep learning because it has many branches. A planning method searching for a sequence of actions can belong to AI without training a neural network.

We also separate the model from the software product. The interface, database, authentication and rules for saving information are application components. A model can classify a message, but the application determines who sees the result and whether it may trigger a change in the system.

What belongs to AI without being machine learning?

Search, planning and explicit reasoning

A classical family of AI approaches explicitly represents possible states, actions and an objective. The system can search for a route or a sequence of steps satisfying particular conditions. In a knowledge-based system, facts and inference rules support the deduction of conclusions.

These mechanisms differ from fitting a model to examples. However, we do not label every “if–then” condition as artificial intelligence. Checking a required field or calculating a total are ordinary software operations, even inside an application integrating AI.

Rules still matter alongside a model

A system can use ML to propose an enquiry category and exact rules to assign responsibility. If a user cannot access a customer record, the application must enforce that restriction rather than leave it to the model's interpretation. The same applies to operating limits and approvals.

In a software development project for a business, the choice is not “code or AI”. The model is integrated into a product with rules, handled errors and clear responsibilities. A simple rule can be the appropriate solution for one stage and a trained model for another.

What does a machine-learning model actually learn?

Classification and estimating values

In supervised learning, examples include inputs and known outcomes. For classification, the outcome can be a category such as “sales” or “support”. For regression, the target is a numerical value, such as the duration of a service visit. Training adjusts the model's parameters for the selected objective.

Algorithms such as logistic regression, decision trees and tree ensembles provide different modelling mechanisms. Selection is not based on the method's name alone: we test the available data, errors by category and behaviour under the conditions of the process.

Discovering structure in data

Unsupervised learning looks for structure without a labelled target for every example. A clustering algorithm can group similar behaviours. The groups require interpretation and verification; appearing distinct in a chart does not automatically make them useful commercial segments.

The representation of inputs matters

The model receives a representation of data: numbers, categories, text vectors or other structures. For tables, the variables and treatment of missing values must be defined. For text, a representation can use term frequencies or vectors produced by another model.

Machine learning therefore does not mean sending a file and removing design work. The team defines the problem, checks the data, selects the representation and establishes evaluation criteria. The scikit-learn documentation explicitly addresses this combination of preprocessing, fitting and prediction.

What does deep learning add?

Representations learned at multiple levels

A deep neural network applies successive transformations to information. Training adjusts the parameters of its layers so that the learned representations support the objective. The idea is not for a programmer to manually describe every relevant contour, phrase or combination.

In a vision application, a network can learn visual representations useful for classification or detection. In a language system, representations are adapted to processing sequences and context. CNNs, recurrent networks and Transformers are architecture families, not successive software subscription tiers.

More layers do not, by themselves, demonstrate quality. Architecture, data, the training objective and evaluation all matter. The relationship between depth and performance must be tested on the task; it is not a rule that every larger model is automatically more suitable.

Deep learning is used in many image, speech and language processing systems, but is not restricted to them. Equally, tabular data can be handled effectively using classical methods. The type of input is a criterion for analysis, not enough on its own to decide the technology.

The difference between specified rules and learned parameters

In a program using explicit rules, a specialist defines conditions and actions. With a trained model, the team specifies data, an objective and a procedure, while learning adjusts parameters. Both approaches are implemented in software; the difference is where some of the behaviour is determined.

What is specified in code, and what does the model learn?

  1. Explicit rules

    A specialist defines conditions; the program applies those rules.

  2. Trained model

    The team defines data and an objective; training adjusts parameters.

Both approaches still need application code for access, validation, integration and error handling.

In classical ML, the choice of variables and representation can play a major role. In deep learning, the model also learns representations at multiple levels. This is not a boundary between “everything manual” and “everything automatic”: representation-learning methods exist outside deep networks, and DL systems still require data selection and evaluation design.

Explanation and traceability must also be distinguished. For a rule, we can trace the condition applied; for a model, we can record the version, input, output and appropriate analysis method. Operational logging remains necessary even when a model supplies a natural-language explanation.

One process: triaging enquiries received by a company

Customer support team wearing headsets with microphones
Mikhail Nilov

Suppose a team receives messages about quotations, support and urgent requests. The objective is to propose a category and refer unclear cases to an operator. This is an example of a possible architecture, not a measured customer outcome.

The explicit-rules approach

A program can use the form selected by the customer, a product code or a destination address. Where these details are stable and sufficient, rules can handle part of the triage directly. Free text introduces combinations and exceptions that need analysis rather than endless additions to keyword lists.

The classical machine-learning approach

We use labelled messages and a numerical representation of text, then train a classifier. Each category is checked, not just the overall percentage of correct answers. The team defines how to handle ambiguous messages, rare classes and changes in commercial vocabulary.

The deep-learning approach

We can use neural representations, adapt a model or integrate a pretrained language model for classification and summarisation. Comparison must cover quality on the same messages, response time, cost and data-processing conditions. A generative model does not replace validation of the category and subsequent action.

In practice, a hybrid workflow can apply reliable rules, consult the model for the remainder and request human review for defined cases. Business process automation with AI integration connects these stages to the team's applications, with limits and logs, without automatically turning a prediction into a final action.

What data is needed, and how is it prepared?

Checking documents and calculations at a desk
Mikhail Nilov

A supervised task requires examples with consistent definitions of outcomes. If two operators use the “urgent” label differently, the model receives an inconsistent target. Clarifying labelling rules can matter more than changing the algorithm.

We check missing information, duplicates, the period covered and rare situations. A copy of the same message in training and testing can create an impression of performance that does not carry over to new messages. For time-dependent data or customer groups, the split must reflect actual use rather than automatically being random.

There is no universal number of examples sufficient for every project. Requirements depend on variation between cases, the number of classes, label quality and the possibility of using a pretrained model. We track how results change when representative examples are added rather than presenting volume as an isolated sales argument.

A dashboard for company metrics and data can expose data quality and errors by category. Internal information also needs separate data protection controls in AI applications, including access, retention and information sent to suppliers.

Training, validation, testing and inference

Training adjusts parameters using selected examples. Validation supports comparison of alternatives and selection of a configuration. Final testing assesses the selected solution on held-out data. Inference is the use of a model to produce a result for an input.

Training and evaluation without data leakage

  1. Separate data

    Define examples and a split appropriate to the process.

  2. Training

    Adjust the model using training data.

  3. Validation

    Compare alternatives and select the configuration.

  4. Final test

    Evaluate the selected solution on held-out data.

Monitor new production cases; significant changes require a new evaluation.

These roles remain distinct when cross-validation procedures are used. The final test must not become a dataset on which a model is repeatedly adjusted until it achieves the desired score. Likewise, transformations that learn from data are fitted on training data and applied consistently afterwards.

A model receiving a new request is not automatically retrained. Application history, request context and parameter updates are different mechanisms. The actual process for selecting new data, reviewing it and introducing it into a new version must be specified.

Do we need to train a neural network from scratch?

Not for every application. A project can use a pretrained model, adapt it to specific data or keep the model unchanged while modifying the information supplied to it. Reusing a learned representation and adjusting parameters are two decisions that should be explained in a proposal.

A document-processing system can involve OCR, classification, field extraction and exact validations. Some components can use pretrained models and others company rules. Our guide to AI document processing and integrating data into applications explains how these responsibilities connect.

In a custom application with AI integration, we also assess supplier dependency, model version, data rights and behaviour when a service is unavailable. Training a proprietary model does not remove these issues; it changes some of the operating responsibilities.

How do we choose between rules, classical ML and deep learning?

Start with the task and a simple baseline. Use explicit rules for exact conditions. For relationships within data, test models suited to its structure. For images, language or complex representations, evaluate neural methods too, including pretrained models.

From requirement to a justified choice

  1. 1 · Process

    Which decision or activity needs assistance?

  2. 2 · Data

    Which examples and sources may we use?

  3. 3 · Options

    Rules, classical ML, deep learning or a combination.

  4. 4 · Comparison

    The same cases, metrics and operating conditions.

  5. 5 · Integration

    Access, confirmation, monitoring and operating cost.

The final decision connects evaluation results with requirements and the operating budget.

Comparison covers outcomes on relevant cases, the frequency and severity of errors, time, resources and control. A model with a better aggregate score may require more review for the category that matters to the process. Criteria should therefore be established before selecting a preferred approach.

Separate the cost of building from the cost of use. Relevant components include data preparation, integration, computation, storage, human verification and updates. These are detailed in our guide to AI application costs and maintenance.

Why can a high accuracy percentage be misleading?

An aggregate metric can hide the exact mistake a company wants to prevent. For classification, we examine the confusion matrix and class-level metrics. Recall measures the proportion of a class's actual cases correctly identified; precision measures the proportion of predictions in that class that are correct.

Teaching example using illustrative data: of 100 messages, 90 are standard and 10 are urgent. A system that always predicts “standard” gets 90 out of 100 correct, giving 90% accuracy. However, it identifies 0 of the 10 urgent enquiries: recall for the urgent category is 0%.

Why 90% accuracy can hide the actual problem

  1. 100 messages

    90 standard and 10 urgent. The system always predicts “standard”.

  2. 90% accuracy

    90 correct predictions out of 100 messages.

  3. 0% urgent recall

    0 urgent enquiries detected out of the 10 present.

Teaching example using illustrative data, not a WebHat result. Match the metric to the category and error that matter to the process.

This is not a benchmark or the performance of a WebHat project. It illustrates why a business objective needs a suitable technical criterion. For regression, we examine the size and distribution of errors; for a complete application, we also measure human intervention, cost and time to an accepted outcome.

Frequently asked questions about AI, machine learning and deep learning

Is machine learning the same as artificial intelligence?

Machine learning is part of AI. Artificial intelligence also includes methods such as search, planning and reasoning with explicit knowledge. These labels are not interchangeable, even when they appear together in an application's description.

Is every neural network deep learning?

Deep learning refers to models with multiple layers of representation and processing. Depth should be described for the specific architecture through its layers and transformations. A simple neural network should not automatically be presented as a deep system.

Is deep learning always better than classical ML?

The choice is made through task evaluation. Data quality, representation, resources, important errors and operation can favour different alternatives. A solution is justified by comparison on relevant cases, not simply the network's depth.

Can a small company use deep learning?

Yes, it can integrate a pretrained model or a specialised component into an application. The project must check usefulness, cost, data access and hosting requirements. It does not automatically involve building a large model from scratch.

Does generative AI sit outside this relationship?

Generative describes a family of modelling approaches and content-producing uses, not a separate level outside AI, ML and DL. Many generative applications use deep learning. Classifications can describe the same solution from different perspectives.

What is the first step in choosing a solution?

Define the process, expected outcome and verification method. Gather representative examples and establish who approves important cases. Then compare alternatives on the same data and criteria before expanding their use.